2008/04/19（２） Arudou Debito

http://s02.megalodon.jp/2008-0419-1735-41/www.debito.org/index.php/?p=1633

Bravo!!
Mr Arudou has publicized the comment.

Thanks Mr Arudou, I really appreciate. Let's start open and fair discussion!!!


http://www.debito.org/index.php/?p=1633
http://s02.megalodon.jp/2008-0419-0419-56/www.debito.org/index.php/?p=1633




Mr Arudou, let's check the facts before you jump to the conclusion.
Last time,Nozaki was found guilty for the destruction of Corpse.

野崎容疑者は１１年、飲食店勤務のフィリピン人女性＝当時（２７）＝の遺体を切断、捨てたなどとして埼玉県警に死体損壊容疑などで逮捕され、懲役３年６月の実刑判決を受けている

http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/crime/080407/crm0804071243014-n2.htm
http://s04.megalodon.jp/2008-0419-0310-11/sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/crime/080407/crm0804071243014-n2.htm
And、

Article 190. (Destruction of Corpses)
A person who damages, abandons or unlawfully possesses a corpse, the ashes or
hair of a dead person, or an object placed in a coffin shall be punished by
imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years.

We don't know and the court does not know he killed the woman, but we know and the court knows he committed the destruction of Corpse.
Why do you know he killed the woman? because Nozaki is Japanese?

He was sentenced three years and 6 months in prison, but the maximum penalty for the crime is 3 years in prison. So he must also have been charged with another crime.

I am sure Nozaki will be charged with murder this time, considering the evidences we have.

Now Mr Idubor's charge was quasi-rape.

Article 177 (Rape)
A person who, through assault or intimidation, forcibly commits sexual intercourse
with a female of not less than thirteen years of age commits the crime of rape and
shall be punished by imprisonment with work for a definite term of not less than 3
years. The same shall apply to a person who commits sexual intercourse with a
female under thirteen years of age.
Article 178. (Quasi Forcible Indecency; Quasi Rape)
(1) A person who commits an indecent act upon a male or female by taking
advantage of loss of consciousness or inability to resist, or by causing a loss of
consciousness or inability to resist, shall be punished in the same manner as
prescribed for in Article 176.
(2) A person who commits sexual intercourse with a female by taking advantage of a
loss of consciousness or inability to resist, or by causing a loss of consciousness or　inability to resist, shall be punished in the same matter as prescribed in the
preceding Article.

According to the court text, Mr Ibudor admitted he molested the woman, the fact that you and Mr Ibudor have been covering up unitl pointed out. Mr Idubor now claims that the police made the document up, but as far as the court text goes, he didn't deny it at the court. Mr Arudou has rejected the request to give his wife and sister a chance to explain whether he denied it at the court and/or why he didn't deny it at the court..


Mr Ibudor was sentenced three years in prison now he is appealing to the higher court.

I hope you give him and his wife and sister to give full explanation in other blogs.


As for the media report, Nozaki's case is reported pretty widely in Japan.

Sankei

http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/crime/080407/crm0804071243014-n2.htm
関連ニュース

* お台場バラバラ事件に湾岸署出動！！「肉片抱えた男」姿消す
* 「踊る大捜査線」の北村さんが一日署長　東京湾岸署
* 台場の比人女性切断遺体　別の男も関与か
* お台場マンション切断遺体　３日夕方以降に死亡か
* お台場のマンションでバラバラ遺体　２０代のフィリピン人女性か　偽装結婚でトラブル？
* お台場のマンションに女性の遺体の一部発見？　居住者のフィリピン人女性か

Mainichi関連記事
4月14日 死体損壊：被害者の比女性、死因は首を絞められ窒息死
4月11日 死体損壊：運河で比人女性とみられる頭部を発見写真付き記事
死体損壊：コインロッカーの部分遺体も比人女性と判明
4月8日 死体損壊：女性と家賃分担巡りトラブル　野崎容疑者
4月7日 死体損壊：女性切断の疑いで同居の男を逮捕　東京・台場写真付き記事
4月5日 死体損壊：被害者は女性　東京・台場の切断遺体
4月4日 死体損壊：男が肉片抱え持つ　東京・台場のマンション写真付き記事
死体損壊：東京・台場のマンションに肉片、比女性の遺体か　同居人姿消す

Video

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4zmv9_news

And in the video, the reporter interviewed the vicitm's mother. The victim's mother said she thought Japan was a safe place.

Do you know Japanese woman was killed in Philippine recently?

http://www.asahi.com/international/update/0404/TKY200804040316.html

フィリピン・ルソン島で日本人女性殺される

2008年04月04日21時12分

　【マニラ＝木村文】フィリピン国家警察によると、ルソン島カビテ州ロサリオの民家で４日、この家に住む日本人女性で会社員のパレデス陽子さん（３６）＝兵庫県出身＝とみられる遺体が見つかった。首などを刃物で刺されており、強盗殺人の可能性があるとして捜査をしている。

　調べによると、パレデスさんはフィリピン人男性と結婚しているが、夫は日本で働いており、フィリピンの自宅に１人で住んでいたという。４日朝、出勤してこないことを心配した同僚が自宅に行き、２階で倒れていた女性を発見したという。

There is only one article about this murder in Japanese media. Do you think it is unfair?
Do you think we should make a fuss about it, cursing the Philippines, Philippine judicial system, Filipinos as you do to Japan?

I am not sure what would have happened if the victim was an American.

Was it unfair of Japanese media to ask for imformation for a missing American woman in Hokkaido when Japanese media do not usually ask imformation for a missing Japanese?
Japan probe reported it http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4304
but you didn't though you live in Hokkaido and you claim to be helping foreingers in Japan. You want to be that fair?

We know when the victim was Britain, there was sensational reports about it in Japan and in England.
Not every murder in Japan where the victim is Japanese is covered in Japanese media.
Do you think Japanese media should sensationalize every incident of murder?


Mr Arudou, let's find the truth, or just try. Let's be fair. Let's not suppress the speech, let's not suppress the truth. Let's not be bullshit.


Arudou Debito/Arudou Debito