data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3c41/d3c417e58909844a115fb4976cb4df673f8c47ea" alt=""
Debito org
The comment has been blocked
No6 The examination of the testimony by the accused.
The accused under the investigation and the court stated " ・・・in the car on the way to and in front of the M's house....F started toughing my penis and so I poked my finger into her genital, we didn't go so far as to have sex." page 15
" Supported by the accused, he had me sit at the front
seat. The accused said we were going to the hospital because I was too drunk.....
I went asleep and found myself in front of M's house."
page 5
"It is agreed that F met the accused for the first time when the rape took place, ......the accuser was warned that she would be charged of perjury if she were to give false testimony. She does not have sufficient reason to put the accused into guilty by committing perjury and making statements that is insulting to herself."
page 7
指紋採取の是非は別にして、「このうち128人は、昨年11月20日以降の指紋・顔写真を提供させる入国審査で上陸が拒否された」というところは面白いですね。テロ犯人よりも不法入国者発見で役立っているわけかな?
Come to think of it, the fingerprinting stuff was left out of the English translation. Not of interest to English-language readers?
What I’m really waiting for is the torrent of apologies, marching in the streets and international diplomatic wrangling which will follow the announcement that the rape charges against the US Marine have been dropped. I’m waiting for Fukuda to call the false charges, “Unforgiveable!” (I guess I shouldn’t hold my breath?
March 1st, 2008 at 5:15 pm
もう被害者の名誉を毀損するのはやめませんか?
沖縄の少女の事件の場合、米軍も容疑者も、he kissed and pressed up against the girl とはいっているわけでしょ。この場合、暴行罪が成立しますが、女性が親告しない場合、検察は暴行罪に関しても起訴できないわけです。
有道さん、あなたはDRさんのような被害者の名誉を毀損するようなコメントは許可して、こうしたコメントはブロックするわけですね?